[j-nsp] unsubsribe

ciscozest ciscozest at gmail.com
Thu Jun 14 09:32:11 EDT 2007


Dear Moderator,
I tried many times to unsubscribe but always failed although with correct
password (never receive email confirmation).
Please help to unsubscribe me from this mailing list. 

Thank you..

-----Original Message-----
From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Monika M
Sent: Thursday, 14 June, 2007 6:19 PM
To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net; angel.bardarov at btc-net.bg
Subject: [j-nsp] VPLS with 2 interfaces on the same router

There was a discussion on this forum with the above subject concluding the
below point.

*The value of "site-identifier" must be equal or less then the value
of " site-range". With your current configuration if you configure this
VPLS service on another router the traffic won't be forwarded over the
MPLS cloud.
*
But as per Juniper document, the site range specifies the total number of
sites in the VPLS.  If this is the total number of sites, why should it be
greatere than the site id?

Assume we have 10 PEs in a instance. We will configure site range as 10 in
all the PEs.
The site id of individual PEs can be in any range. Could be 50-60,
60-70.....
I am not able to get the dependencies between these two configuration. Had
never come across in Juniper document also such a dependancy. Could you
please explain the reason behind this condition specified in your mail?

TIA,
Monika
**
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp



More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list