[j-nsp] frame-relay J6350 to Cisco 2611

[Scott Morris]

On the Cisco side, you can establish IETF in many ways.  "encapsulation
frame-relay ietf" will set a baseline for all PVCs.  "frame-relay map ip
x.x.x.x yyy ietf" or "frame-relay interface-dlci yyy ietf" will set
encapsulation on a per pvc basis.  

But yes, you'll need to make the change for that particular pvc(s)
connecting to the Juniper box.  "show frame-relay pvc" will let you see the
encapsulation for each of the PVCs defined.

HTH,

Scott
 

-----Original Message-----
From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of BRIANT Alain
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 4:02 AM
To: Ivan c
Cc: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] frame-relay J6350 to Cisco 2611

I am not sure but I believe yes
As long as Juniper does only normalized software.

As I remember Cisco has a proprietary encapsulation if you type on the cisco
side "encapsulation frame-relay" without the IETF keyword.

You will also be able to modify the cisco side to remove this keyword if it
doesn't work.

Alain


Ivan c a écrit :

>thanks Alain,
>
>does the "encapsulation frame-relay" give IETF?
>
>cheers
>Ivan
>
>On 9/13/07, BRIANT Alain <alain.briant at c-s.fr> wrote:
>  
>
>>Hi Ivan
>>
>>here is a starting config assuming you are on the serial 1/0/0
>>
>>lab at toto# show interfaces
>>se-1/0/0 {
>>    dce;
>>    encapsulation frame-relay;
>>    serial-options {
>>        clock-rate 2.048mhz;
>>    }
>>    unit 0 {
>>        dlci 199;
>>        family inet {
>>            address 192.168.1.1/30;
>>        }
>>    }
>>}
>>
>>You will need the starting "serial-option and clock-rate" only if you 
>>have a DCE cable (female one and male on the cisco side) In the 
>>contrary you will need to remove it.
>>The DCE statement should be needed as you have a DTE behavior by 
>>default on the cisco side.
>>I'm not sure it will disturb but I would advise you to test first 
>>without the "crypto map IPSec-con" statement on the cisco side
>>
>>You will normaly be able to ping from one side to the other one Good 
>>tests regards Alain
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Ivan c a écrit :
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Hi All,
>>>
>>>Looking for a little help with a frame-relay connection between a
>>>Cisco 2611 and a Juniper J6350.
>>>
>>>This is the serial interface on the J6350, which I hope can play
>>>frame-relay with IETF?
>>>http://www.juniper.net/products/jseries/dsheet/100116.pdf
>>>
>>>
>>>This is the Cisco 2611 side of the equation, which is currently
>>>working to a Cisco 7206 which is getting swapped out for the J6350
>>>
>>>interface Serial0/0
>>>mtu 1550
>>>no ip address
>>>encapsulation frame-relay IETF
>>>load-interval 30
>>>no fair-queue
>>>frame-relay traffic-shaping
>>>!
>>>interface Serial0/0.199 point-to-point
>>>ip address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.252
>>>frame-relay interface-dlci 199
>>>crypto map IPSec-con
>>>
>>>any ideas for the Juniper side of the equation would be much appreciated.
>>>
>>>thanks
>>>Ivan
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>  
>

_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp