[j-nsp] J2300 T1 Load balancing

[Mark Tinka]

On Thursday 03 April 2008, Peder @ NetworkOblivion wrote:

> It shows them both, so it appears to be what everybody
> else said.   I guess it is just a case of "it is what it
> is".  We can't do it this way. Thanks all for your help.

Just a thought in this line; has anyone had a chance to try 
per-prefix load balancing which became newly available in 
JunOS 9.0?

We are still currently deploying JunOS 9.0.

Cheers,

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20080403/a1fb90d5/attachment.bin