[j-nsp] Route Distinguisher and Route Target

[Mark Tinka]

On Sunday 13 April 2008, damien holloway wrote:

> the only other thing some people like to consider is what
> happens though a RR. If different RD's are used when
> redundant routes appear both are advertised to PE's so
> load sharing can occur and also convergance may be
> slightly better, since both routes are present...

Interesting you should mention this - we have considered 
using the "Protocol Independent Load Balancing for Layer 3 
VPN's" feature to achieve load balancing of VPN routes 
independently of the assigned RD.

We should be testing that in over the next couple of weeks.

Cheers,

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20080413/cd12b5d7/attachment.bin