[j-nsp] Subject: Cisco equivalent of exist-map

junos fordummies junos.fordummies at googlemail.com
Fri Jan 4 10:31:49 EST 2008


correct - sorry I didnt interperate your reply properly ;)

J.

On 03/01/2008, Daniel Roesen <dr at cluenet.de> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 01:53:23PM +0000, junos fordummies wrote:
> > actually it is. A few guys here emailed me back suggesting using a
> > generated route. I've tested this in the lab and it works a treat. I
> > am tracking an ospf route, when that dissapears so does the aggregate
> > (generate) advertised towards my peer.
>
> But this OSPF route is a more-specific route of the generated route,
> correct? THAT works. But the original request suggested that 9.9.9.9/32
> should be taken as "trigger route" for generating a 10/8 route. And
> this ain't possible, neither with "aggregate", nor "generate". Both
> accept only more-specific routes as contributors.
>
> See also:
>
> http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos85/swconfig85-routing/id-10359002.html#id-10359002
>
> Best regards,
> Daniel
>
> --
> CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list