[j-nsp] redundant scenario

[Stevanus]

Hi Mathias,

If your J6350 run JUNOS with enhanced services, you can setup JSRP 
(Juniper Network Stateful Redudancy Protocol).
But I'm not really sure if this is the solution you're looking for.
Still a newbie though >.<

Regards,

Stevanus

Matthias Gelbhardt wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I am hoping you can give me some tips for implementing this scenario.
>
> I have two locations each with two J6350 routers. The locations are 
> connected via a fiber network with each other. On each location the 
> J's do have at least one eBGP session to different carriers. The boxes 
> speak iBGP over the fiberlink with each other. We have split our PA 
> space, so that we can announce different prefixes on each location. 
> The prefixes which are not originating on one location will be 
> received through iBGP from the originating one.
>
> How could I implement a redundant scenario? At first I had thought 
> about getting the other prefixes via eBGP, but that is something, 
> which seams to be no "clean" solution. Furthermore our carriers seam 
> to be not happy with announcing prefixes with our AS in the path back 
> to us.
>
> The more clean solution could be establishing a tunnel between the 
> location over the internet and speak iBGP with a low priority over it. 
> Unfortunatly I am a bit lost, which type of tunnel I should use for 
> this scenario, as the J's are unable to implement a L2TP tunnel for 
> example.
>
> Would be great to get an idea and help implementing this!
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthias
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>