[j-nsp] vpls remote mac learning on M20 on Junos 9.1?

[Marlon Duksa]

Thanks. Can you provide little more info on this, or at least doc reference.
I've never heard of this.
Thanks,
Marlon

On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Simon Chen <simonchennj at gmail.com> wrote:

> One thing to add, if you don't have the tunnel-pic, you need to
> configure some sort of VE interface, in addition to use
> "no-tunnel-services" statement.
>
> -Simon
>
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 9:00 AM, Marlon Duksa <mduksa at gmail.com> wrote:
> > A-ha. Thanks.
> > I needed an additional router in my setup, so I was using this older M20.
> > Obviously this won't work. If I segment my M320 into two logical routers,
> > then one of those two logical routers on M320  would replace the M20 and
> I
> > should be able to proceed with this VPLS setup, correct?
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 1:53 AM, <sthaug at nethelp.no> wrote:
> >
> >> > Yes, no tp hardware in the chassis, this is why I'm using no-tunnel
> >> > -services cmd.
> >> >
> >> > Is there any workaround? Or at least the documentation mentioning that
> >> VPLS
> >> > PE is not supported on certain FPCs...
> >>
> >> Documented for instance at
> >>
> >>
> >>
> http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos91/swconfig-vpns/configuring-vpls-without-a-tunnel-services-pic.html#id-11543506
> >>
> >> "When you configure VPLS without a Tunnel Services PIC by including
> >> the no-tunnel-services statement, the following limitations apply:
> >> An Enhanced FPC is required."
> >>
> >> Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug at nethelp.no
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> >
>