[j-nsp] vpls remote mac learning on M20 on Junos 9.1?

[Simon Chen]

One thing to add, if you don't have the tunnel-pic, you need to
configure some sort of VE interface, in addition to use
"no-tunnel-services" statement.

-Simon

On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 9:00 AM, Marlon Duksa <mduksa at gmail.com> wrote:
> A-ha. Thanks.
> I needed an additional router in my setup, so I was using this older M20.
> Obviously this won't work. If I segment my M320 into two logical routers,
> then one of those two logical routers on M320  would replace the M20 and I
> should be able to proceed with this VPLS setup, correct?
>
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 1:53 AM, <sthaug at nethelp.no> wrote:
>
>> > Yes, no tp hardware in the chassis, this is why I'm using no-tunnel
>> > -services cmd.
>> >
>> > Is there any workaround? Or at least the documentation mentioning that
>> VPLS
>> > PE is not supported on certain FPCs...
>>
>> Documented for instance at
>>
>>
>> http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos91/swconfig-vpns/configuring-vpls-without-a-tunnel-services-pic.html#id-11543506
>>
>> "When you configure VPLS without a Tunnel Services PIC by including
>> the no-tunnel-services statement, the following limitations apply:
>> An Enhanced FPC is required."
>>
>> Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug at nethelp.no
>>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>