[j-nsp] BGP question

[Amos Rosenboim]

Hello Doug,

Thanks,
I'm not sure I'm following you, would you mind elaborating?

Regards

Amos

On May 30, 2008, at 2:27 AM, Doug Marschke wrote:

> Depending on the implementation, these AS could be ignored  
> confederation
> loop checking is done on sub-as number only.
>
> If you still having an issue, you can override as loop detection with
> the as-loops command.
>
> Doug Marschke
> Principal Technologist
> Strategic Networks Training
> JNCIE-ER #3, JNCIE-M/T #41, JNCIS-FW, JNCI
> www.ietraining.net
> (415)902-5702
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Amos  
> Rosenboim
> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 9:56 AM
> To: juniper-nsp
> Subject: [j-nsp] BGP question
>
> Hello List,
>
> This is not Juniper specific, but I think it's an interesting case
> anyway.
> A global carrier is running an MPLS network to provide L3 and L2
> vpns. Obviously this carrier doesn't have presence in every city and
> every country so he forms partnerships with local carriers to extend
> the his footprint.
> This is done by establishing type B inter as NNI links.
> The iBGP topology of this carrier is using confederations.
>
> The problem now is that one of the new partners is using a private
> AS, which happens to match one of the BGP confederations used inside
> the global carrier network.
> This obviously creates a problem which I'm looking to overcome.
>
> Any ideas will be appreciated.
>
> Regards
>
> Amos
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp