[j-nsp] Juniper Olive Installation

Munish Saini msaini at ixiacom.com
Wed Jun 4 01:24:22 EDT 2008


Hi all,

The Olive installation doc with VM ware workstation.

Thanks & Best Regards

-----Original Message-----
From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
juniper-nsp-request at puck.nether.net
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 9:30 PM
To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: juniper-nsp Digest, Vol 67, Issue 5

Send juniper-nsp mailing list submissions to
	juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	juniper-nsp-request at puck.nether.net

You can reach the person managing the list at
	juniper-nsp-owner at puck.nether.net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of juniper-nsp digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Juniper Olive. (Hernan)
   2. Re: Juniper Olive. (Peder Bach)
   3. juniper mpls mtu (cp)
   4. Re: juniper mpls mtu (Daniel Roesen)
   5. MPLS LDP (sunnyday)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 13:09:05 +0200
From: Hernan <hernan.gaggiotti at gmail.com>
Subject: [j-nsp] Juniper Olive.
To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
Message-ID:
	<98bad2b20806030409pf9a686ck9423de2c773aca53 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

HI All:
Sombody knows, how install the Olive.. (juniper emulator)...? Could you
give
me any input about that soft.. ?  or where i can
find more information.

Thanks and regards..


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 13:34:04 +0200
From: "Peder Bach" <pederbach at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper Olive.
To: Hernan <hernan.gaggiotti at gmail.com>
Cc: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
Message-ID:
	<131472d10806030434w4cecefacs8c809dd0b4df7cb4 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

http://juniper.cluepon.net/index.php/Olive



On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Hernan <hernan.gaggiotti at gmail.com>
wrote:
> HI All:
> Sombody knows, how install the Olive.. (juniper emulator)...? Could
you give
> me any input about that soft.. ?  or where i can
> find more information.
>
> Thanks and regards..
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>


------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 09:15:30 -0400
From: "cp" <lists at pleasants.net>
Subject: [j-nsp] juniper mpls mtu
To: <juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID: <7A6C26B678F8EB48ADBA3A1C75FD2508071075 at moe.pleasants.net>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"

I hoping someone can provide insight into why by default juniper
calculates mpls mtu at 12 bytes less than the ip mtu?  I've been testing
using l3vpn and it seems that mpls mtu pads 8 bytes to its mpls mtu
reducing the ip mtu the inside packet by 8 bytes. Quick example. So if
mpls mtu is 1508 the ip mtu of the packet inside is 1500. That means the
ip mtu of the mpls interface is 1520. The only reason I can see
additional bytes needed on top of the l3vpn two is for fast reroute
bypass.  I assume it's for the safety factor although I am probably
missing something. Any information is appreciated.

 

-Chip

 

 

 

 

 

 



------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 17:19:51 +0200
From: Daniel Roesen <dr at cluenet.de>
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] juniper mpls mtu
To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
Message-ID: <20080603151951.GA20683 at srv01.cluenet.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 09:15:30AM -0400, cp wrote:
> I hoping someone can provide insight into why by default juniper
> calculates mpls mtu at 12 bytes less than the ip mtu?  I've been
testing
> using l3vpn and it seems that mpls mtu pads 8 bytes to its mpls mtu
> reducing the ip mtu the inside packet by 8 bytes. Quick example. So if
> mpls mtu is 1508 the ip mtu of the packet inside is 1500. That means
the
> ip mtu of the mpls interface is 1520. The only reason I can see
> additional bytes needed on top of the l3vpn two is for fast reroute
> bypass.  I assume it's for the safety factor although I am probably
> missing something. Any information is appreciated.

Exactly that's the case as far as I'm aware. They have chosen a default
"enough for most usages" headroom.

Then again, defaults may change, so it's good engineering practice to
set MTUs for all protocols explicitly.

Best regards,
Daniel

-- 
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0


------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 18:49:09 +0300
From: "sunnyday" <cscosunny at gmail.com>
Subject: [j-nsp] MPLS LDP
To: "Juniper-Nsp" <juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID: <003c01c8c591$5e5bbf60$1b133e20$@com>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"

Hello I have configured mpls ldp in my network and I want all ip traffic
to
go through mpls.

I have issued the command mpls ldp ip-forwarding but the traffic seems
to go
through isis when I trace route to an ip I see  no label assignment.

After that I have issued the mpls ldp ip-forwarding hosts-only and all
/32
traffic was going through mpls but all the /30 or other subnets 

Where going through isis.Any help would be appreciated.

Thank you 

 

 



------------------------------

_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list
juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

End of juniper-nsp Digest, Vol 67, Issue 5
******************************************


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list