[j-nsp] Juniper Olive Installation

[Tim Donahue]

Your best bet is the source of most knowledge on the Internet, Google.

http://www.google.com/search?rls=en&q=Olive+Juniper+VMware&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8

Tim

On 6/4/08 1:24 AM, "Munish Saini" <msaini at ixiacom.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> The Olive installation doc with VM ware workstation.
> 
> Thanks & Best Regards
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> juniper-nsp-request at puck.nether.net
> Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 9:30 PM
> To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: juniper-nsp Digest, Vol 67, Issue 5
> 
> Send juniper-nsp mailing list submissions to
> juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> juniper-nsp-request at puck.nether.net
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> juniper-nsp-owner at puck.nether.net
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of juniper-nsp digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Juniper Olive. (Hernan)
>    2. Re: Juniper Olive. (Peder Bach)
>    3. juniper mpls mtu (cp)
>    4. Re: juniper mpls mtu (Daniel Roesen)
>    5. MPLS LDP (sunnyday)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 13:09:05 +0200
> From: Hernan <hernan.gaggiotti at gmail.com>
> Subject: [j-nsp] Juniper Olive.
> To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Message-ID:
> <98bad2b20806030409pf9a686ck9423de2c773aca53 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> 
> HI All:
> Sombody knows, how install the Olive.. (juniper emulator)...? Could you
> give
> me any input about that soft.. ?  or where i can
> find more information.
> 
> Thanks and regards..
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 13:34:04 +0200
> From: "Peder Bach" <pederbach at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper Olive.
> To: Hernan <hernan.gaggiotti at gmail.com>
> Cc: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Message-ID:
> <131472d10806030434w4cecefacs8c809dd0b4df7cb4 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> 
> http://juniper.cluepon.net/index.php/Olive
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Hernan <hernan.gaggiotti at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> HI All:
>> Sombody knows, how install the Olive.. (juniper emulator)...? Could
> you give
>> me any input about that soft.. ?  or where i can
>> find more information.
>> 
>> Thanks and regards..
>> _______________________________________________
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 09:15:30 -0400
> From: "cp" <lists at pleasants.net>
> Subject: [j-nsp] juniper mpls mtu
> To: <juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> Message-ID: <7A6C26B678F8EB48ADBA3A1C75FD2508071075 at moe.pleasants.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> I hoping someone can provide insight into why by default juniper
> calculates mpls mtu at 12 bytes less than the ip mtu?  I've been testing
> using l3vpn and it seems that mpls mtu pads 8 bytes to its mpls mtu
> reducing the ip mtu the inside packet by 8 bytes. Quick example. So if
> mpls mtu is 1508 the ip mtu of the packet inside is 1500. That means the
> ip mtu of the mpls interface is 1520. The only reason I can see
> additional bytes needed on top of the l3vpn two is for fast reroute
> bypass.  I assume it's for the safety factor although I am probably
> missing something. Any information is appreciated.
> 
>  
> 
> -Chip
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 17:19:51 +0200
> From: Daniel Roesen <dr at cluenet.de>
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] juniper mpls mtu
> To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Message-ID: <20080603151951.GA20683 at srv01.cluenet.de>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 09:15:30AM -0400, cp wrote:
>> I hoping someone can provide insight into why by default juniper
>> calculates mpls mtu at 12 bytes less than the ip mtu?  I've been
> testing
>> using l3vpn and it seems that mpls mtu pads 8 bytes to its mpls mtu
>> reducing the ip mtu the inside packet by 8 bytes. Quick example. So if
>> mpls mtu is 1508 the ip mtu of the packet inside is 1500. That means
> the
>> ip mtu of the mpls interface is 1520. The only reason I can see
>> additional bytes needed on top of the l3vpn two is for fast reroute
>> bypass.  I assume it's for the safety factor although I am probably
>> missing something. Any information is appreciated.
> 
> Exactly that's the case as far as I'm aware. They have chosen a default
> "enough for most usages" headroom.
> 
> Then again, defaults may change, so it's good engineering practice to
> set MTUs for all protocols explicitly.
> 
> Best regards,
> Daniel