[j-nsp] juniper-nsp Digest, Vol 67, Issue 15
Brendan Regan
brendan.bregan at gmail.com
Wed Jun 11 16:11:46 EDT 2008
Hi,
With the advice of everyone and the following link I have managed to get the
Lacp working by removing tagged ports.
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/2825?search_string=lacp%20juniper;#2825
Thanks a million,
Brendan
On 6/11/08, juniper-nsp-request at puck.nether.net <
juniper-nsp-request at puck.nether.net> wrote:
>
> Send juniper-nsp mailing list submissions to
> juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> juniper-nsp-request at puck.nether.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> juniper-nsp-owner at puck.nether.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of juniper-nsp digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Juniper - Foundry Link aggregation (Gareth Campling)
> 2. Re: Changing a route based on latency (Alex)
> 3. 3rd party DWDM SFPs (Chuck Anderson)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:20:48 +0100
> From: "Gareth Campling" <gareth at griffin.com>
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper - Foundry Link aggregation
> To: "Brendan Regan" <brendan.bregan at gmail.com>,
> <juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> Message-ID:
> <
> 39C2B4777DC0364FBBF4D8233402E6C7022DF766 at dpp-exch01-a.network.griffin.net.uk
> >
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>
> Here is sample config from one of our sites running Juniper M10i and a
> Foundry RX with a 2 port aggregation
>
> == Juniper M10i ==
>
> ge-1/0/0 {
> description "1GB to Port 3/7";
> gigether-options {
> 802.3ad ae0;
> }
> }
> ge-1/1/0 {
> description "1GB to Port 2/7";
> gigether-options {
> 802.3ad ae0;
> }
> }
>
> ae0 {
> description "2GB Trunk";
> vlan-tagging;
> mtu 9192;
> aggregated-ether-options {
> lacp {
> active;
> }
> }
>
>
> Physical interface: ae0, Enabled, Physical link is Up
> Interface index: 128, SNMP ifIndex: 34
> Link-level type: Ethernet, MTU: 9192, Speed: 2000mbps, Loopback:
> Disabled, Source filtering: Disabled, Flow control: Disabled,
> Minimum links needed: 1, Minimum bandwidth needed: 0
> Device flags : Present Running
>
>
> == Foundry RX ==
>
> interface ethernet 3/7
> link-aggregate passive
>
> interface ethernet 2/7
> link-aggregate passive
>
> #show link-aggregate
> Long timeout: 90, default: 90
> Short timeout: 3, default: 3
> Port [Sys P] [Port P] [ Key ]
> [Act][Tio][Agg][Syn][Col][Dis][Def][Exp][Ope]
> 2/7 1 1 2 No L Agg Syn Col Dis No No
> Ope
> 3/7 1 1 2 No L Agg Syn Col Dis No No
> Ope
>
> HTH
>
> Gareth Campling
> Senior Network Engineer
> Griffin Internet
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Brendan Regan
> Sent: 10 June 2008 18:16
> To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [j-nsp] Juniper - Foundry Link aggregation
>
> Hi,
> I was wondering if anyone had managed to setup 802.3ad link aggregation
> between a foundry fesx and a juniper m5.
>
> I have followed the outlines of both vendors on how this should be
> setup.
> The ports on the Juniper are active and the foundry passive and the
> ports on
> the foundry show up as blocked state.
>
> If anyone has a working config setup I am wondering if they could e-mail
> me
> a sample of this.
>
> Thanks,
> Brendan
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:45:22 +0100
> From: "Alex" <alex.arseniev at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Changing a route based on latency
> To: "Junaid" <junaid.x86 at gmail.com>, "juniper-nsp"
> <juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> Message-ID: <3954436B29E54877B5CC7419E0ACE91D at jnpr.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> reply-type=original
>
> Junaid,
> You don't need a server for ICMP Echo Replies and ICMP Timestamp Replies.
> Make sure these packets are not blocked by firewall though.
> You only need a server for TCP/UDP and HTTP probe replies (unless you
> enable
> JWeb on the remote router, in this case you don't need a server for HTTP
> either).
> Rgds
> Alex
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Junaid" <junaid.x86 at gmail.com>
> To: "juniper-nsp" <juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 10:07 AM
> Subject: [j-nsp] Changing a route based on latency
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was going through the documentation for RPM (Real-time Performance
> > Monitor) and as I suspected, we need a server (Juniper router) at the
> > other end to send us responses. Is there a feature/solution that does
> > not require any config on the remote end; like we can send ICMP echos
> > and based on the response we can take some action.
> >
> > What I need is a mechanism to change my uplink from my primary service
> > provider to my secondary service provider based on the delay/latency I
> > am experiencing on the primary link. Any suggestion?
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Junaid
> > _______________________________________________
> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 11:55:43 -0400
> From: Chuck Anderson <cra at WPI.EDU>
> Subject: [j-nsp] 3rd party DWDM SFPs
> To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Message-ID: <20080611155543.GL10754 at angus.ind.WPI.EDU>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Does anyone have any experience, good or bad, with using 3rd party
> DWDM SFPs in M120 or M10i Gigabit Ethernet PICs? Specifically, I'm
> looking at using these SFPs:
>
> Finisar FWLF1631xx 2.67 Gigabit RoHS Compliant DWDM SFP with APD
> Receiver:
>
>
> http://www.finisar.com/product-124-2.67_Gigabit_RoHS_Compliant_DWDM_SFP_with_APD_Receiver_(FWLF1631xx)
>
>
> With two each of the above in these PICs:
>
> M120: PC-8GE-TYPE3-SFP-IQ2
> M10i: PE-4GE-TYPE1-SFP-IQ2
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list
> juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
> End of juniper-nsp Digest, Vol 67, Issue 15
> *******************************************
>
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list