[j-nsp] Q-in-Q configuration on Juniper Gig interface
sthaug at nethelp.no
sthaug at nethelp.no
Fri May 30 11:09:59 EDT 2008
> > > I don't think you need IQ, IIRC anything modern (SFP-based GE's, 10GE, MX
> > > ports, etc) can do this.
> >
> > That is true for the MX ports, but not on "regular" M series PICs as
> > far as I know.
> >
> > Have you gotten it to work?
>
> The docs I have say flexible-ethernet-services was supported on 1GE SFP
> PICs in 6.3, but there is no support for fixed-optics GE PICs.
This is true. But note that flexible-ethernet-services is not the same as
stacked-vlan-tagging or flexible-vlan-tagging.
> I haven't
> actually tried it myself (the only GE-SFP PICs I used for double-tagging
> just happened to be IQ), but I'm 99% confident that this works unless a
> lot of people have been lying to me. :)
Afraid you'll be disappointed then. This is from an M7i:
FPC 0 E-FPC
PIC 1 REV 08 750-010238 PB7782 1x G/E SFP, 1000 BASE
Xcvr 0 NON-JNPR PR05014273 SFP-T
ge-0/1/0 {
stacked-vlan-tagging;
encapsulation flexible-ethernet-services;
unit 1 {
vlan-tags outer 2 inner 3;
family inet {
address 10.0.0.1/30;
}
}
}
JunOS lets you configure it - but it doesn't work, and there are a couple
of nasty error message logged:
May 30 14:58:34 xyzzy /kernel: ether_iflconfig:ge-0/1/0 (porttype 57) does not support vlan-tags outer <vlan-id> inner <vlan-id> option
May 30 14:58:34 xyzzy dcd[4326]: DCD_CONFIG_WRITE_FAILED: Interface ge-0/1/0, configuration write failed for an IFL ADD: Operation not supported
I'd argue that you shouldn't be allowed to configure this at all, since
it doesn't work.
Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug at nethelp.no
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list