[j-nsp] Redistribute Connected
Brendan Mannella
bmannella at teraswitch.com
Mon Nov 24 20:45:33 EST 2008
I already advertise my entire /21 to eBGP transits. I am just trying to make the two router aware of which has a specific subnet.
Brendan Mannella
President and CEO
TeraSwitch Networks Inc.
Ph: 412-387-3543
Mobile: 412-592-7848
Efax: 412-202-7094
----- Original Message -----
From: "le van cuong" <cuonglv at gmail.com>
To: "Brendan Mannella" <bmannella at teraswitch.com>
Cc: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 8:57:08 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Redistribute Connected
Hi Brendan,
I think you need to create a policy with mach term direct and then export to IBGP and also EBGP if needed. BGP itself will not be redistributed other protocol to its neighbor.
ex:
policy-options {
policy-statement dr-bgp {
term 1 {
from {
protocol direct;
route-filter x.x.x./y exact;
}
then accept;
}
}
}
Regards& Good Luck,
Cuong,
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 8:25 AM, Brendan Mannella < bmannella at teraswitch.com > wrote:
Hello,
I am working with two M7is running EBGP with a transit on each, and IBGP between the two routers. When i create a new sub interface with a ip and vlan on one router the route is not being advertised to the other router via IBGP. I assume i need some policy for that. Can anyone shed any light on how to do this?
Thanks,
Brendan
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list