[j-nsp] Redistribute Connected

Brendan Mannella bmannella at teraswitch.com
Mon Nov 24 20:45:33 EST 2008


I already advertise my entire /21 to eBGP transits. I am just trying to make the two router aware of which has a specific subnet. 

Brendan Mannella 
President and CEO 
TeraSwitch Networks Inc. 
Ph: 412-387-3543 
Mobile: 412-592-7848 
Efax: 412-202-7094 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "le van cuong" <cuonglv at gmail.com> 
To: "Brendan Mannella" <bmannella at teraswitch.com> 
Cc: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net 
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 8:57:08 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Redistribute Connected 


Hi Brendan, 

I think you need to create a policy with mach term direct and then export to IBGP and also EBGP if needed. BGP itself will not be redistributed other protocol to its neighbor. 

ex: 
policy-options { 
policy-statement dr-bgp { 
term 1 { 
from { 
protocol direct; 
route-filter x.x.x./y exact; 
} 
then accept; 
} 
} 
} 

Regards& Good Luck, 

Cuong, 


On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 8:25 AM, Brendan Mannella < bmannella at teraswitch.com > wrote: 


Hello, 

I am working with two M7is running EBGP with a transit on each, and IBGP between the two routers. When i create a new sub interface with a ip and vlan on one router the route is not being advertised to the other router via IBGP. I assume i need some policy for that. Can anyone shed any light on how to do this? 

Thanks, 

Brendan 
_______________________________________________ 
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp 



More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list