[j-nsp] Juniper M20 LACP oddness.
sthaug at nethelp.no
sthaug at nethelp.no
Fri Apr 24 17:29:43 EDT 2009
> Why do you believe this is a hash settings issue?
Maybe because you didn't say anything about it?
> The egress load seems evenly distributed between the two active interfaces. When the ae0 interface plateaus at 1Gbps , both physical interfaces plateau at ~500Mbps. I've also read that layer-4 hashing can be CPU/memory intensive. Would just layer-3 be sufficient?
The Juniper router performs the hashing in hardware. CPU/memory isn't
really relevant here.
At our end we have recent experience with load balancing Internet
traffic over 5 x 1 Gbps links. We used layer3 *and* layer-4 hashing,
and got very good distribution of the traffic. We were able to fill
all 5 links to capacity.
Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug at nethelp.no
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list