[j-nsp] l2circuit in vrf
Marcus Eide
marcus at conf.se
Fri Jan 9 07:55:41 EST 2009
Hi angel,
Thank you. This is actually a typo, from when I copy/pasted the config. I
checked my config again and I do have lt-1/2/0.1 in the routing-instance.
On Fri, 09 Jan 2009 14:50:45 +0200, angel <angel.bardarov at btc-net.bg>
wrote:
> Marcus Eide wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I don't know if this is even possible, but I thought I'd ask you: Does
>> anyone know if it's possible to connect an l2circuit to an vrf type
>> routing-instance?
>>
>> I found some information that stated this could be done with logical
>> tunnel
>> interfaces, so I tried the following:
>>
>>
>> interface lt-1/2/0 {
>> unit 0 {
>> encapsulation ethernet-ccc;
>> peer-unit 1;
>> family ccc;
>> }
>> unit 1 {
>> encapsulation ethernet;
>> peer-unit 0;
>> family inet {
>> address 192.168.3.1/24;
>> }
>> }
>> }
>>
>> protocol l2circuit {
>> neighbor 172.16.0.2 {
>> interface lt-1/2/0.0 {
>> virtual-circuit-id 7777;
>> }
>> }
>> }
>>
>> routing-instance VRF1003 {
>> instance-type vrf;
>> interface lo0.1003;
>> interface lt-1/2/0.1003;
>>
> Marcus,
> You misconfigured lt unit numbers - in routing instance configuration
> you must specify the peer lt unit number with "family inet" - in your
> case it is lt-1/2/0.1
>
> regards
>
>> route-distinguisher 65000:1003;
>> vrf-target target:65000:1003;
>> vrf-table-label;
>> }
>>
>> The l2circuit shows up, but there's no traffic coming through.
>>
>> Any thoughts on the subject is appreciated.
>>
>> /Marcus
>> _______________________________________________
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>
>>
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list