[j-nsp] l2circuit in vrf

Marcus Eide marcus at conf.se
Fri Jan 9 07:55:41 EST 2009


Hi angel,
Thank you. This is actually a typo, from when I copy/pasted the config. I
checked my config again and I do have lt-1/2/0.1 in the routing-instance.

On Fri, 09 Jan 2009 14:50:45 +0200, angel <angel.bardarov at btc-net.bg>
wrote:
> Marcus Eide wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I don't know if this is even possible, but I thought I'd ask you: Does
>> anyone know if it's possible to connect an l2circuit to an vrf type
>> routing-instance?
>>
>> I found some information that stated this could be done with logical
>> tunnel
>> interfaces, so I tried the following:
>>
>>
>> interface lt-1/2/0 {
>>     unit 0 {
>>         encapsulation ethernet-ccc;
>>         peer-unit 1;
>>         family ccc;
>>     }
>>     unit 1 {
>>         encapsulation ethernet;
>>         peer-unit 0;
>>         family inet {
>>             address 192.168.3.1/24;
>>         }
>>     }
>> }
>>
>> protocol l2circuit {
>>     neighbor 172.16.0.2 {
>>         interface lt-1/2/0.0 {
>>             virtual-circuit-id 7777;
>>         }
>>     }
>> }
>>
>> routing-instance VRF1003 {
>>     instance-type vrf;
>>     interface lo0.1003;
>>     interface lt-1/2/0.1003;
>>   
> Marcus,
> You misconfigured lt unit numbers - in routing instance configuration 
> you must specify the peer lt unit number with "family inet" - in your 
> case it is lt-1/2/0.1
> 
> regards
> 
>>     route-distinguisher 65000:1003;
>>     vrf-target target:65000:1003;
>>     vrf-table-label;
>> }
>>
>> The l2circuit shows up, but there's no traffic coming through.
>>
>> Any thoughts on the subject is appreciated.
>>
>> /Marcus
>> _______________________________________________
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>
>>


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list