[j-nsp] l2circuit in vrf
angel
angel.bardarov at btc-net.bg
Fri Jan 9 08:15:44 EST 2009
Marcus Eide wrote:
> Hi angel,
> Thank you. This is actually a typo, from when I copy/pasted the config. I
> checked my config again and I do have lt-1/2/0.1 in the routing-instance.
>
Do you have Tunnel (or similar) PIC in your box? You can configure lt
interfaces but without the PIC traffic can't be forwarded between peer
lt units.
> On Fri, 09 Jan 2009 14:50:45 +0200, angel <angel.bardarov at btc-net.bg>
> wrote:
>
>> Marcus Eide wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I don't know if this is even possible, but I thought I'd ask you: Does
>>> anyone know if it's possible to connect an l2circuit to an vrf type
>>> routing-instance?
>>>
>>> I found some information that stated this could be done with logical
>>> tunnel
>>> interfaces, so I tried the following:
>>>
>>>
>>> interface lt-1/2/0 {
>>> unit 0 {
>>> encapsulation ethernet-ccc;
>>> peer-unit 1;
>>> family ccc;
>>> }
>>> unit 1 {
>>> encapsulation ethernet;
>>> peer-unit 0;
>>> family inet {
>>> address 192.168.3.1/24;
>>> }
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> protocol l2circuit {
>>> neighbor 172.16.0.2 {
>>> interface lt-1/2/0.0 {
>>> virtual-circuit-id 7777;
>>> }
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> routing-instance VRF1003 {
>>> instance-type vrf;
>>> interface lo0.1003;
>>> interface lt-1/2/0.1003;
>>>
>>>
>> Marcus,
>> You misconfigured lt unit numbers - in routing instance configuration
>> you must specify the peer lt unit number with "family inet" - in your
>> case it is lt-1/2/0.1
>>
>> regards
>>
>>
>>> route-distinguisher 65000:1003;
>>> vrf-target target:65000:1003;
>>> vrf-table-label;
>>> }
>>>
>>> The l2circuit shows up, but there's no traffic coming through.
>>>
>>> Any thoughts on the subject is appreciated.
>>>
>>> /Marcus
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list