[j-nsp] IPV6 over PPP with radius

[fighter worker]

thanks for your help

On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Junaid <junaid.x86 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If you are assigning IP addresses from local-pool, you dont need any
> change on the RADIUS server. However, you will need to have a PPP
> dialer that understands IPv6. Although, v6 address is not assigned by
> PPP but IPV6CP negotiates each node's Interface Identifier. Windows
> Vista's PPP dialer supports v6, as well as the PPP dialer shipped with
> Linux.
>
> Junaid
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:44 PM, fighter worker <knowhowccie at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Dear all
>>
>>
>>
>> iam trying to implement IPV6 over PPPOE and i need to know if there is any
>> modification to the PPPOE protocol as i know PPPOE is responsible only for
>> simulating p2p over ethernet and to provide authentication model over ethernet
>> and as far i know that PPP was modified to support IPv6 encapsulation, also
>> iam using a radius server for authentication and dont send any ip related
>> parameters in the radius replay as my BRAS is using pools for assiging IP for
>> each PPP session so do i need to make this radius support IPV6 also or the
>> normal radius server will work
>>
>>
>>
>> appreciate your help
>>
>> Regards
>> _______________________________________________
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>
>