[j-nsp] MX960 JunOS recommendations

[Tima Maryin]

What did you mean by "inappropriately configured" ?

There are the same mtu settings everywhere and traffic passes quite well.
And ospf session goes up without problems.

And how comes that "inappropriately configured IP and MPLS MTU" work well on 
9.3R3.8 ?


Krzysztof Szarkowicz wrote:
> It is not a nasty bug, but problem of inappropriately configured IP and MPLS MTUs on transit nodes.
> 
> //Krzysztof
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> Tima Maryin
> Sent: Wednesday, 11 November, 2009 8:28
> To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MX960 JunOS recommendations
> 
> 9.3R4.4 has a nasty bug which occures in setup when you have bgp session over 
> chain of few routers/links with ospf/ldp
> 
> bgp session occasionally goes down with notification timeout. Even when there is 
> no traffic at all and no physical errors
> 
> rollback to 9.3r3 helps though
> 
> 
> JTAC still not confirmed it, but it easlily can be reprodused in lab
> 
> 
> 
> Phil Shafer wrote:
>> Derick Winkworth writes:
>>> 9.3r4 indeed. Perhaps even 9.4r4 when that comes out.
>> FWIW: 9.5 has a number of scripting-related features, including
>> interactivity and remote RPC access.  We've been working to ensure
>> that scripting PRs are backported to at least 9.5.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>  Phil
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> 
> 
>