[j-nsp] MVPN Interoperability Issue

Harry Reynolds harry at juniper.net
Fri Oct 16 14:53:32 EDT 2009


For draft rosen I would suggest gre rather than mpls p-2-mp. Not sure that latter is even supported.

There are a few other interop notes, but depends on if you plan rosen6 or rosen7.

In either case, you need to have a lo0.x with the same ip as the main instance lo0 in each mvpn vrf. This is addresses with 10.0R2 rli 11113, but until then, this is how it is.

For rosen7 you need ios that supports the inet-mdt bgp family, and you must ensure those routes are tagged with the extended RT comm. This too is addressed in 10.0R2, with rli 11114.

HTHs

 

-----Original Message-----
From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Stefan Fouant
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 10:47 AM
To: Juniper List
Subject: [j-nsp] MVPN Interoperability Issue

Anyone on list have any success setting up Multicast over BGP-MPLS VPNs in a heterogenous environment consisting of both Juniper and Cisco routers?
Basically, I've got Juniper MX running as PE router with Cisco 7600s as P router.  I don't think Cisco supports NG-VPN yet, so I'm trying to get draft-rosen running between the Juniper and the Cisco...  Doesn't appear that I can get p2mp tunnels signalled through the P routers.  Not really trying to get hardcore troubleshooting assistance but rather I'm just curious if anyone out there has managed to get this working, and also any additional feedback you might be able to provide.

Thanks in advance,

--
Stefan Fouant
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list