[j-nsp] optimized switchover
Matthias Gelbhardt
matthias at commy.de
Tue Sep 8 03:53:47 EDT 2009
Has no one an idea? It seems, that I am really stuck here. Do I have to
activate something on the other side (hence the AdminDown status?)
Regards,
Matthias
Matthias Gelbhardt schrieb:
> Hello David,
>
> great tip. Unfortunatly BFD for BGP - though detailed documented - has
> no examples flying around. Perhaps I am missing something here.
>
> I have two routers connected via iBGP. I have tried to make the
> configuration rather simple (only the important parts, BGP session is up
> and running):
>
> This is the same on both sides (change in the IP-addresses of course)
>
> protocols bgp {
> group internal {
> type internal;
> neighbor 91.190.xxx.xxx {
> local-address 91.190.xxx.xxx;
> bfd-liveness-detection {
> minimum-interval 1000;
> multiplier 3;
> }
> }
> }
>
> Router A:
> show bfd session extensive
> Detect Transmit
> Address State Interface Time Interval
> Multiplier
> 91.190.xxx.xxx Init 3.000 1.000 3
> Client BGP, TX interval 1.000, RX interval 1.000
> Session down time 00:00:04
> Local diagnostic CtlExpire, remote diagnostic None
> Remote state Down, version 1
> Min async interval 1.000, min slow interval 1.000
> Adaptive async TX interval 1.000, RX interval 1.000
> Local min TX interval 1.000, minimum RX interval 1.000, multiplier 3
> Remote min TX interval 1.000, min RX interval 1.000, multiplier 3
> Local discriminator 1, remote discriminator 1
> Echo mode disabled/inactive, no-absorb, no-refresh, update-adj
> Multi-hop, min-recv-TTL 0, route table 0, local-address 91.190.xxx.xxx
>
> 1 sessions, 1 clients
> Cumulative transmit rate 1.0 pps, cumulative receive rate 1.0 pps
>
> Router B:
> show bfd session extensive
> Detect Transmit
> Address State Interface Time Interval
> Multiplier
> 91.190.xxx.xxx Down 0.000 1.000 3
> Client BGP, TX interval 1.000, RX interval 1.000
> Local diagnostic None, remote diagnostic None
> Remote state AdminDown, version 1
> Min async interval 1.000, min slow interval 1.000
> Adaptive async TX interval 1.000, RX interval 1.000
> Local min TX interval 1.000, minimum RX interval 1.000, multiplier 3
> Remote min TX interval 0.000, min RX interval 0.000, multiplier 0
> Local discriminator 1, remote discriminator 0
> Echo mode disabled/inactive, no-absorb, no-refresh
> Multi-hop route table 0, local-address 91.190.xxx.xxx
>
> 1 sessions, 1 clients
> Cumulative transmit rate 1.0 pps, cumulative receive rate 0.0 pps
>
> I see the diagnostic on router A but do not understand it. I thought the
> minimum-interval might be too low, so I set it up to a thousand.
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthias
>
>
> David Ball schrieb:
>> There are likely several answers to that, all dependant on your
>> topology and protocol use. But, a good place to start would be BFD
>> (bidirectional forwarding detection). Juniper has decent support for
>> it working with other protocols (OSPF, ISIS, BGP, RIP), notifying them
>> that something may be wrong, allowing them to then make a decision
>> (support may differ from protocol to protocol). That may be a good
>> start point.
>>
>> http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos95/swconfig-routing/swconfig-routing-IX.html#B
>>
>>
>> David B
>>
>>
>> 2009/9/6 Matthias Gelbhardt <matthias at commy.de>:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> I wonder what the best practices for optimized switchovers would be?
>>> I mean
>>> fast comprehension of failed BGP connections? A fibre cut or
>>> something like
>>> that, how can I be sure, that my routers are detecting the failed
>>> session as
>>> soon as possible? What would be the best practices fpr that?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Matthias
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list