[j-nsp] JNCIP Case Study - 1 Pg 42 - archive size and files

Yue Min smartsuites at gmail.com
Thu Sep 10 23:00:33 EDT 2009

Actually I feel the way ( all community in all routers rather than
specific community in specific router ) would save your time not waste
your time.

On 9/10/09, Stefan Fouant <sfouant at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 4:28 AM, Stevanus <stevanus at datacomm.co.id> wrote:
>>  Sorry for a little bit OOT. So suppose I configure bgp community
>> attributes for all routers instead of all EBGP peering routers as required
>> in the exam, then I won't lose any points?
>> Thanks
>> - Stevanus -
> Again, you could do this, unless the exam requirements explicitly stated
> otherwise.  As long as the overall functionality meets the stated
> requirements, then you should not lose any points... but I beg to ask the
> question... why would you want to waste your time with unnecessary typing
> for that which is not explicitly required?  During these exams, time is your
> worst enemy.
> --
> Stefan Fouant
> Stay the patient course.
> Of little worth is your ire.
> The network is down.
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Sent from my mobile device

More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list