[j-nsp] software version to use?

[George Guzic]

I run the same version pretty much on the same setup, eBGP peering and some iBGP, and OSPF on 6350's.
Also 9.6 versions, includes a number of bug fixes, including a crash bug (I don't remember the PR on it) which I actually run into back in July.

Regards,

George

-----Original Message-----
From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Chris Kawchuk
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 10:07 AM
To: Matthias Gelbhardt
Cc: juniper-nsp
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] software version to use?

Hi Matthias,

A customer of mine just installed 9.6R1.13 on 2 x J6350's doing
exactly what you describe (i.e. JunOS in "Routing" (non-secure mode),
doing a series of eBGP peering and some iBGP, some OSPF area 0.0.0.0
stuff, etc...) Works great - no issues.

9.6 Offers the possibility of doing mixed "flow-mode" and "packet-
mode" based on protocol, filter, or interfaces; meaning you can take
advantage of the "Security" based flow/services/ALGs etc. on a J,
while also enabling regular packet-mode throughput for the majority of
your traffic (thus not running into any scaling limitations in terms
of the session/flow table).

Regards,

- Chris.




On 2009-09-16, at 2:23 AM, Matthias Gelbhardt wrote:

> Hi!
>
> Interesting, they are recommend 9.6R1 für the J-series. Wouldn't
> that be stupid, as I think Mark is right. Are old versions not so
> stable on J-series?
>
> On the other hand, the routers should only do routing and BGP,
> nothing more, nothing less.
>
> Matthias
>
> Benny Sumitro schrieb:

_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp