[j-nsp] Miercom Competitive Performance Testing Results: CiscoASR9000 vs Juniper MX960

[Markus Åberg]

You are aware of what kind of testing we are talking about with Miercom and Tolly..? 

The tests are paid for by one vendor in order to typically put focus on some corner case problem in another vendors equipment.

I am not saying that the specific results obtained are wrong, but it is probably very interesting to see the test parameters and configurations used in the test to be able to verify how realistic they are for real-world scenarios. 

"Information contained in this report is based upon results observed a Cisco facility in San Jose, CA. Test cases were based on parameters set by Cisco."

Thanks,

       ///Markus Åberg


-----Original Message-----
From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jeff Tantsura
Sent: 24. syyskuuta 2009 8:46
To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] Miercom Competitive Performance Testing Results: CiscoASR9000 vs Juniper MX960

Hi,

Would be interesting to see Juniper's reaction on following report:

http://www.miercom.com/dl.html?fid=20090827&type=report

Cheers,
Jeff


_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp