[j-nsp] Miercom Competitive Performance Testing Results: Cisco ASR9000 vs Juniper MX960
Richard A Steenbergen
ras at e-gerbil.net
Thu Sep 24 04:11:36 EDT 2009
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:46:01PM -0700, Jeff Tantsura wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Would be interesting to see Juniper's reaction on following report:
>
> http://www.miercom.com/dl.html?fid=20090827&type=report
These reports are total frauds, Cisco pays Miercom to produce them and
to make sure the results always come out in their favor. They typically
find edge cases to focus on, misconfigure the competition boxes, provide
no way to verify their claims, and make sure to never feature any test
in which the Cisco box fails. The Miercom 7600 vs M7i report for example
was a work of pure comedy, if not for the thought that some poor sap
might have actually believed a word of it. The FUD machine has been
working overtime against the MX lately too, because it is an first rate
box and the competition has absolutely nothing to compete against it
technically.
--
Richard A Steenbergen <ras at e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list