[j-nsp] /32 host routes on down interfaces

sthaug at nethelp.no sthaug at nethelp.no
Thu Apr 22 16:05:15 EDT 2010


> That is an interesting find - my thought would have been the same.  Don't
> install the route OR the host route into the table unless it's active.
> 
> Why would you have a route entry exist to an interface that is down and
> could never pass traffic?  Just my thoughts...
> 
> Would be interesting to hear from JTAC if this was a design "feature" or an
> overlooked "oops"....

I believe they regard it as a feature since it's been like this for
years.

Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug at nethelp.no


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list