[j-nsp] SRX5800 HA over 40 KM

Fahad Khan fahad.khan at gmail.com
Tue Aug 31 13:16:17 EDT 2010


Especially for private services but can be for public services as well. i
want to keep them A/P.

Will Control and Fabric links work on this distance?

Actually we want geographical redundancy so simple making all master
equipments in one DC and backup equipment in an other DC (Like master FW ,
Master EX8208 in one DC and respective backups are in another DC)

how do you comment on that?

regards,


Muhammad Fahad Khan
JNCIP - M/T # 834
IT Specialist
Global Technology Services, IBM
fahad at pk.ibm.com
+92-301-8247638
Skype: fahad-ibm
http://pk.linkedin.com/in/muhammadfahadkhan


On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Stefan Fouant <
sfouant at shortestpathfirst.net> wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-
> > bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Fahad Khan
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 10:55 AM
> > To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > Subject: [j-nsp] SRX5800 HA over 40 KM
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > Can I place two SRX 5800 in separate DCs in HA and the distance in
> > between
> > these two Data centers is around 40 Km.
> >
> > has any body experienced it??
>
> It can be done under certain circumstances but it bears getting additional
> information before an answer can be given.
>
> Are these for private services or publicly available services.  Are you
> planning on doing A/A or A/P and from a routing perspective how to you
> intend on failing respective flows from one data center to another, i.e.
> Anycast, etc...
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stefan Fouant, CISSP, JNCIEx2
> www.shortestpathfirst.net
> GPG Key ID: 0xB5E3803D
>
>


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list