[j-nsp] Stable Junos

[Mark Tinka]

On Wednesday, September 01, 2010 12:06:26 am Richard A 
Steenbergen wrote:

> ... but we're gonna be
> forced into 10.2+ for MX to get full Trio support soon
> anyways, so there isn't much benefit to hanging around
> 10.0 even if it was stable.

Same reason we're going to 10.2 - MX80 support as well as 
some new NG-MVPN stuff.

I wish 10.5 were coming out tomorrow, but for now, 10.2R2.11 
has been behaving with the little we're doing. I'm tired of 
chasing JUNOS for the past 2 years, so I wouldn't mind 
continuing with 10.2R2.11 until 10.5R4 or 10.6R4 comes out 
(and works). Of course, that's hoping we don't run into 
anything major with 10.2R2.11 :-\.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20100901/b4fa58a7/attachment.bin>