[j-nsp] EX4200 filter buggy?

[Richard A Steenbergen]

On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 01:31:59PM +0000, Charlie Allom wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> has anyone else seen these messages:
> 
> Dec  2 13:29:43  sw0.cll fpc0 Invalid prev page id 101 and next page id 101 for fw -559038737 
> Dec  2 13:29:45  sw0.cll fpc2 Invalid prev page id 101 and next page id 101 for fw -559038737 
> Dec  2 13:29:50  sw0.cll fpc1 Invalid prev page id 100 and next page id 100 for fw -559038737 
> Dec  2 13:29:51  sw0.cll fpc0 Invalid prev page id 102 and next page id 102 for fw -559038737 
> Dec  2 13:29:54  sw0.cll fpc2 Invalid prev page id 102 and next page id 102 for fw -559038737 
> Dec  2 13:29:58  sw0.cll fpc1 Invalid prev page id 101 and next page id 101 for fw -559038737 
> Dec  2 13:29:59  sw0.cll fpc0 Invalid prev page id 103 and next page id 103 for fw -559038737 
> Dec  2 13:30:02  sw0.cll fpc2 Invalid prev page id 103 and next page id 103 for fw -559038737 
> Dec  2 13:30:03  sw0.cll mib2d[843]: LIBJSNMP_NS_LOG_WARNING: WARNING: AgentX master agent failed to respond to ping.  Attempting to re-register. 
> Dec  2 13:30:06  sw0.cll fpc1 Invalid prev page id 102 and next page id 102 for fw -559038737 
> Dec  2 13:30:08  sw0.cll fpc0 Invalid prev page id 104 and next page id 104 for fw -559038737 
> Dec  2 13:30:10  sw0.cll fpc2 Invalid prev page id 104 and next page id 104 for 
> 
> ...repeating for up to an hour on a commit on firewall filters? pfem
> process also runs at 100% cpu and starts to impact things like SNMP.
> 
> JTAC just can't or wont advance on my case. I'm beginning to think one
> of the PFE's is broken somehow..
> 
> Is there a way to know what firewall filter "-559038737" is?

Clearly not a valid one. What code? Odds are good you should probably 
just upgrade. :)

-- 
Richard A Steenbergen <ras at e-gerbil.net>       http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)