[j-nsp] bla.bla.bla.0

[Ian Henderson]

On 11/12/2010, at 2:27 PM, Good One wrote:
> I was just thinking about using bla.bla.bla.0/32 (as a loopback address) and bla.bla.bla.0/31 on some point to point interfaces. Not sure which one is ugly and not useable at the moment. But would love to hear from you guys... 		 	   		  

It'll work, but expect complaints from Windows users that their traceroutes star out (* * *) at those hops.