[j-nsp] bla.bla.bla.0

[Rubens Kuhl]

On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 2:51 AM, Ian Henderson <ianh at ianh.net.au> wrote:
> On 11/12/2010, at 2:27 PM, Good One wrote:
>> I was just thinking about using bla.bla.bla.0/32 (as a loopback address) and bla.bla.bla.0/31 on some point to point interfaces. Not sure which one is ugly and not useable at the moment. But would love to hear from you guys...
>
> It'll work, but expect complaints from Windows users that their traceroutes star out (* * *) at those hops.

That's a nice feature of using .0 and .255 addresses on what used to
be class C space: Windows bots won't DoS you.


Rubens