[j-nsp] EX unsupported filter policer and actions on loopback lo0

Richard A Steenbergen ras at e-gerbil.net
Fri Dec 17 21:37:30 EST 2010

On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 10:29:06AM +0800, Mark Tinka wrote:
> Well, there has been a big push in the last 12 months from 
> Cisco to consolidate feature set code on their switches, and 
> this has included the addition of IS-IS to their portfolio 
> in this class.
> Although it's still v4 IS-IS at this stage, you get it on 
> the 3560, 3750 and 4948.
> I have it running on the 3560G, 3750 and 3750ME.
> Now if only they could add v6 support.

Heh yeah I was shocked when I saw that, but if I still have to set up 
ospfv3 it's almost as annoying. :)

> And unlike Juniper, I don't need a license for it (although 
> my EX's in the lab that have no IS-IS license aren't 
> complaining either) :-).

Yes, there is something seriously wrong about the amount of money you 
can save setting up a redistribution layer through OSPF instead of 
running ISIS. But you still need BGP, or that same redistribution layer 
to get the routes back into BGP (unless you want to blow out your IGP 
with bloat), so I can't get as indignant about it as I'd like. :)

Richard A Steenbergen <ras at e-gerbil.net>       http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)

More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list