[j-nsp] Need suggestions..

[TCIS List Acct]

We are running 8.4 on a few, and 8.5 on the others.

Brendan Mannella wrote:
> What version of code are you using. I have two m7i's, each taking one 
> full table. One runs 8.5 and the other 9.3 and there is a VERY big 
> difference in memory usage.
> 
> Brendan Mannella, CEO
> TeraSwitch Networks Inc.
> Office: 412.224.4333 x303
> Mobile: 412.592.7848
> Efax: 412.202.7094
> 
> On Feb 4, 2010, at 11:43 AM, TCIS List Acct <listacct at tulsaconnect.com> 
> wrote:
> 
>> We have 4 M7i's with RE-400's and 768M RAM and have never had a 
>> problem with taking full routes (we are at 55% memory usage right now).
>>
>> With all of the comments on this topic, should we be worried?
>>
>> Our units push ~200Mbit traffic, so they are nowhere near capacity CPU 
>> wise.
>>
>>> I can confirm your worry about the RE-850.
>>> We had one box with a full Internet table (~310K prefixes) *and* a
>>> reasonable number of L3VPNs with a total of ~160K prefixes, *and* a
>>> high number of interfaces. This box needed enough RE memory that we
>>> started seeing swap usage. Not good.
>>> Now the box has a reduced Internet table, and is happy.
>>> Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug at nethelp.no
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>
>> -- 
>>
>> -----------------------------------------
>> Mike Bacher / listacct at tulsaconnect.com
>> TCIS - TulsaConnect Internet Services
>> http://www.tulsaconnect.com
>> -----------------------------------------
>> _______________________________________________
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

-- 

-----------------------------------------
Mike Bacher / listacct at tulsaconnect.com
TCIS - TulsaConnect Internet Services
http://www.tulsaconnect.com
-----------------------------------------