[j-nsp] Need suggestions..

[Brendan Mannella]

What version of code are you using. I have two m7i's, each taking one  
full table. One runs 8.5 and the other 9.3 and there is a VERY big  
difference in memory usage.

Brendan Mannella, CEO
TeraSwitch Networks Inc.
Office: 412.224.4333 x303
Mobile: 412.592.7848
Efax: 412.202.7094

On Feb 4, 2010, at 11:43 AM, TCIS List Acct  
<listacct at tulsaconnect.com> wrote:

> We have 4 M7i's with RE-400's and 768M RAM and have never had a  
> problem with taking full routes (we are at 55% memory usage right  
> now).
>
> With all of the comments on this topic, should we be worried?
>
> Our units push ~200Mbit traffic, so they are nowhere near capacity  
> CPU wise.
>
>> I can confirm your worry about the RE-850.
>> We had one box with a full Internet table (~310K prefixes) *and* a
>> reasonable number of L3VPNs with a total of ~160K prefixes, *and* a
>> high number of interfaces. This box needed enough RE memory that we
>> started seeing swap usage. Not good.
>> Now the box has a reduced Internet table, and is happy.
>> Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug at nethelp.no
>> _______________________________________________
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
> -- 
>
> -----------------------------------------
> Mike Bacher / listacct at tulsaconnect.com
> TCIS - TulsaConnect Internet Services
> http://www.tulsaconnect.com
> -----------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp