[j-nsp] SRX3400/3600 Stabie Code Recommendations?

[Pavel Lunin]

10.0R1 has a bug in RTSP ALG causing fwdd dumping and all SPC restart. Fixed
in 10.0R2. I have not that much experience with large SRXs but what I say is
10.0R2 working quite stable in production for a couple of months quite
highly loaded.The config was rather straightforward though: src and dst NAT,
LAGs, no clustering, no IPSec, <100 OSPF routes.

--
Pavel

2010/7/24 Clarke Morledge <chmorl at wm.edu>

> There have been a number of views expressed recently on the list regarding
> the SRX and Junos code buggines and instability.  I am wondering if a lot of
> the issues are related to specific platforms.  Specifically, I am curious to
> know about the reliability of some of the smaller data center models, namely
> the 3400 and 3600.  Are there any stable code recommendations to make
> regarding these data center platforms?  Are there any particularly
> noteworthy code revs that one should stay away from?
>
> I tested the 3400 with flavors of 10.0 for an evaluation recently and it
> performed pretty well, but I did not bang on it as much as I wanted.
>
> I find it interesting to say the least that Juniper officially does not
> recommend (or even make available for the lower end) the latest 10.2R1 for
> any of their SRX products, including the higher end models.  And it has been
> two months now and no maintenance release.
>
> Clarke Morledge
> College of William and Mary
> Information Technology - Network Engineering
> Jones Hall (Room 18)
> Williamsburg VA 23187
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>