[j-nsp] MX-80 rumors and heresay - any comments?

[Mark Tinka]

On Friday 19 March 2010 04:55:52 pm Bjørn Skovlund wrote:

> I will expect the box to be very license-based, with a
>  low initial price, but licensing needs for anything
>  besides routing/switching pretty much. I guess it makes
>  sense, considering what possibilities this small box
>  brings and the broad range of markets it's advantageous
>  to.

As a peering and high-end edge aggregation router, this box 
is pretty sweet.

But I think Juniper still need something else for Access in 
the Metro. The MX80, as small as it is, is still too large 
for this role (well, at least price-wise, anyway).

Cheers,

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20100319/bf2b2995/attachment.bin>