[j-nsp] MX240

[joe mcguckin]

Hey Richard,

What are the differences/features of the new TRIO cards? Do they work  
only with the MX80?

Joe

On May 10, 2010, at 10:25 PM, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:

> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:38:41PM +0800, Mark Tinka wrote:
>> Richard's suggestion to consider the MX80 is a good idea,
>> especially if you're looking at having two for redundancy.
>> My main concern is JUNOS 10.x, especially since you're
>> somewhat new to Juniper. But if you can hang in there, the
>> code will improve with time. The MX80 is definitely great
>> for peering... it's a role we're considering for it here,
>> since it's too pricey to stick in the metro :-).
>
> Eh... Given his incredibly simple sounding config, personally I'd just
> just get the Trio/MX80 cards and call it a better long term  
> investment.
> Depending on your exact config they're somewhere between a little  
> and a
> lot cheaper than the old DPCs, and they integrate a lot of the things
> that you previously needed services DPCs for too. Now if only they'd  
> fix
> the damn BGP bugs, we're seeing 4-5 minute stalls from flapping a  
> single
> IBGP session in 10.1 tests.
>
> -- 
> Richard A Steenbergen <ras at e-gerbil.net>       http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
> GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1  
> 2CBC)
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp