[j-nsp] Logical Tunnels & IPv6
Mark Kamichoff
prox at prolixium.com
Sun May 30 20:42:09 EDT 2010
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 05:59:59PM -0500, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
> It's always been like this, and Juniper has ignored all requests to add
> support for IPv6 with ethernet encapsulation on the LT. The only
> work-around is to use frame-relay encapsulation instead of ethernet,
> which works for most but not all use cases.
Thanks guys. I'll give the frame-relay encapsulation a try!
Perhaps we just need a few large carriers to help "nudge" Juniper on
this. I suppose it'll be added eventually though, as more folks start
to add IPv6 to existing IPv4 configurations.
- Mark
--
Mark Kamichoff
prox at prolixium.com
http://www.prolixium.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20100530/12b903dd/attachment.bin>
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list