[j-nsp] SRX650 Clustering - IPv6

Jérôme Fleury jerome at fleury.net
Wed Nov 3 07:25:32 EDT 2010


I have it deployed in "enterprise-style" deployment (dual-stack for
the office users), on a SRX240-H cluster running 10.2R3. It works just
as expected so far.

On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 21:39, Paul Stewart <paul at paulstewart.org> wrote:
> Hmmm.. interesting - I thought I had reviewed 10.2 for this support... will dig deeper.  So then comes the question - anyone actually *using* IPv6 on clustered SRX?  Any real-world feedback?
>
> I have an SRX210H at home and recently discovered an annoying "bug" that IPv6 isn't supported on VLAN interfaces... that was kind of a shock to be blunt..
>
> Thanks,
> Paul
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Crist Clark [mailto:Crist.Clark at globalstar.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 3:22 PM
> To: Paul Stewart; juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SRX650 Clustering - IPv6
>
> I just happened to be looking at the 10.2 release notes after
> seeing your email.
>
>  "IPv6 Support
>    [snip]
>
>    * Chassis cluster—In JUNOS Release 10.2, we support chassis
> cluster in an active-passive (failover) deployment. [Junos OS Security
> Configuration Guide]"
>
> You may want to have a closer look at the 10.2 documentation
> (the current recommended release for SRXs). I am not using
> this feature so I have no personal experience whether it actually
> works.
>
>
> On 11/2/2010 at 10:43 AM, "Paul Stewart" <paul at paulstewart.org> wrote:
>> Hi there.
>>
>>
>>
>> We are looking to bring on an additional SRX650 at a site by
> clustering.
>> One of the requirements though is IPv6 traffic and it appears it's
> not
>> supported?
>>
>>
>>
>> From
>>
> http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos10.0/information-products/topic-c
>
>> ollections/release-notes/10/topic-39007.html :
>>
>>
>>
>> Chassis Cluster
>>
>> On SRX Series and J Series devices, the following features are not
> supported
>> when chassis clustering is enabled on the device:
>>
>> *     All packet-based protocols, such as MPLS, Connectionless
> Network
>> Service (CLNS), and IP version 6 (IPv6)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Do any of the SRX boxes support clustering with IPv6?  Is there any
> timeline
>> on this being fixed that anyone knows of?
>>
>>
>>
>> Our goal is redundant routing engines should something happen - makes
> more
>> $$$ sense to add an additional SRX650 when there is one existing..
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>>
>>
>> Paul
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
>
> --
>
> Crist Clark
> Network Security Specialist, Information Systems
> Globalstar
> 408 933 4387
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp



More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list