[j-nsp] VPLS issue...

[Derick Winkworth]

----- Forwarded Message ----
From: Derick Winkworth <dwinkworth at att.net>
To: Daniel Hilj <daniel.hilj at ipnett.se>
Sent: Thu, October 21, 2010 1:24:12 PM
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] VPLS issue...


I need the local interface to remain up too.





________________________________
From: Daniel Hilj <daniel.hilj at ipnett.se>
To: Derick Winkworth <dwinkworth at att.net>
Sent: Thu, October 21, 2010 11:26:49 AM
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] VPLS issue...

Hi,

To get around the fact of not having a local interface UP that you need for the 
IRB to be UP you can configure an lt-interface and add it to you instance.


Best Regards/Med vänliga hälsningar

Daniel Hilj


21 okt 2010 kl. 18:22 skrev "Derick Winkworth" <dwinkworth at att.net>:

> All:
> 
> We have a two site VPLS setup using virtual-switches.  Site "A" has an IRB in 
> the bridge-domain in the virtual-switch configuration.  All is good when the 
>two 
>
> PEs have a BGP session and the LSPs are up between the two PEs.
> 
> However, when Site "B" becomes unreachable, then the IRB and local interface at 
>
> site "A" go down and the customer can no longer route out using the IRB.  I 
>need 
>
> this irb and the local interface to stay up so Site A can still route out the 
>  IRB even if Site "B" goes down...  
> 
> 
> I tried the "connectivity-type irb" knob, but it doesn't help.  
> 
> Running 10.0S8 on MX240s...
> 
> 
> Any thoughts?
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp