[j-nsp] Fwd: router recommendation

[Keegan Holley]

I've always thought of the J-Series as an enterprise/remote site router and
not a service provider device.  Strangely enough I can't find the throughput
ratings on the data sheet, but I'm sure it's lower than the M/MX and the
like.  I'm not sure if it can handle 2-3G of traffic, you should ask the
reseller for specs or search juniper.net.  The other thing I noticed was
that it only supports a max  of 400k BGP routes.  If the full table is 340
or so that doesn't leave much for L2/L3 vrf's.  Just my 2c.


On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Richard Zheng <rzheng at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> A juniper reseller came back with a suggestion of J-4350. The price is
> similar to a used M7i. I was surprised by this option first. Then
> considering that the application is for a small ISP, it might not be bad.
> The DRAM may be upgraded to 2G which should hold several whole Internet
> tables for quite a while.
>
> Any comment?
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Richard Zheng <rzheng at gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 8:09 AM
> Subject: router recommendation
> To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to have some recommendation of a router model. It is for a small
> ISP. There are 2 or 3 upstreams which feeds the whole Internet routing
> table. Total about 20 peering sessions. The traffic is about 2-3G in 12
> months. Right now we only care about Internet. But if it can scale to
> support layer 2 and/or layer 3 VPN services, that's a big plus.
>
> We have dealt with M20 about 4-5 years ago. I am looking at M7i or M10i.
> Not
> sure if I am on the right path.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Richard
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
>
>