[j-nsp] Multiple LAG Groups / Common Layer3 Routing
Chris Kawchuk
juniperdude at gmail.com
Tue Apr 5 17:11:37 EDT 2011
Hi Paul,
Try this:
interfaces {
/* Repeat for all the physical ports you need to put into the respective aeX LACP groups */
xe-0/2/0 {
description "Connection to blah";
gigether-options {
802.3ad ae0;
}
}
ae0 {
aggregated-ether-options {
minimum-links 1;
lacp {
active;
}
encapsulation flexible-thernet-services;
unit 0 {
encapsulation ethernet-bridge; /* it may just be 'encapsulation ethernet' - try both */
}
}
ae1 {
aggregated-ether-options {
minimum-links 1;
lacp {
active;
}
encapsulation flexible-thernet-services;
unit 0 {
encapsulation ethernet-bridge;
}
}
ae2 {
aggregated-ether-options {
minimum-links 1;
lacp {
active;
}
encapsulation flexible-thernet-services;
unit 0 {
encapsulation ethernet-bridge;
}
}
ae3 {
aggregated-ether-options {
minimum-links 1;
lacp {
active;
}
encapsulation flexible-thernet-services;
unit 0 {
encapsulation ethernet-bridge;
}
}
}
bridge-domains {
FLAT-LAN {
domain-type bridge;
interface ae0.0; /* tie all the ae's into one giant bridge domain / Flat LAN */
interface ae1.0;
interface ae2.0;
interface ae3.0;
vlan-id 999; /* this is irrelevant, as it is untagged leaving the ports - but is required */
routing-interface irb.999 /* L3 routed interface into the bridge-domain */
}
}
- Chris.
On 2011-04-05, at 11:34 PM, Paul Stewart wrote:
> Hi folks..
>
>
>
> Not sure if my subject line reads correctly or not. MX platform running
> 10.0R3.10
>
>
>
> I have eight physical interfaces and want 4 LAG groups (2 interfaces X 4 LAG
> groups) - LACP Passive mode.
>
>
>
> All 4 LAG groups must belong to the same layer3 network.
>
>
>
> I have tried to create AE interfaces with "family bridge" however it rejects
> this but I know this should be something with bridge domains?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Paul
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list