[j-nsp] LT interfaces at MX80

[Doug Hanks]

You can actually configure 50G worth of tunnel-services on the MX80.  10g
worth on FPC0 and 40G worth on FPC1.  You need to be running Junos 10.2R4.
 All of this without losing any revenue ports, but at the cost of
over-subscribing them.

Thank you,

-- 
Doug Hanks - JNCIE-ENT #213,  JNCIE-SP #875
Sr. Systems Engineer
Juniper Networks


On 12/28/11 3:21 PM, "Doug Hanks" <dhanks at juniper.net> wrote:

>I had no problem enabling 10g worth of tunnel-services on a 3D 20x
>1GE(LAN) SFP MIC, but this was on a MX960.  In terms of losing a 10G port,
>that's only true for the first generation DPC card.  With Trio/MPC that is
>no longer the case and you can retain all of your revenue ports, but at
>the loss of 10G in forwarding within the PFE.
>
>Thank you,
>
>-- 
>Doug Hanks - JNCIE-ENT #213,  JNCIE-SP #875
>Sr. Systems Engineer
>Juniper Networks
>
>
>On 12/28/11 5:52 AM, "sthaug at nethelp.no" <sthaug at nethelp.no> wrote:
>
>>> > On the 1G MICs there is extra capacity to handle an lt interface, so
>>> > you can configure under chassis, assuming a 20x1G MIC in MIC slot 0:
>>> >
>>> > fpc 1 {
>>> >    pic 1 {
>>> >        tunnel-services {
>>> >            bandwidth 1g;
>>> >        }
>>> >    }
>>> > }
>>> >
>>> 
>>> I understood that as MIC has enough capacity so I can also use all
>>>20x1G
>>> ports on MIC simultaneously with tunneling ?
>>
>>Yes.
>>
>>> Can I also use all 1G ports on the MIC if I will change bandwidth to
>>>10g ?
>>
>>No. If you need 10G lt capacity you'll also need a 10G MIC, *and* for
>>the 10G lt interface one of the physical 10G ports will no longer be
>>usable.
>>
>>Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug at nethelp.no
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp