[j-nsp] MPLS LSP Load Balance

Matthew Tighe matthew.e.tighe at gmail.com
Thu Feb 3 10:47:27 EST 2011


Do you have multiple LSPs defined (one for each path you want to load
balance over)?

On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Telmo Di Leva <tdileva at ifxcorp.com> wrote:

> Dear JNSP, in this oportunity we are contacting you because we have the
> following trouble:
> Our core plataform is based on M20 and M160.
> For some reason, we cant balance mpls traffic thru multiples oc3.
> We have this links explaining our limitation whit M series:
>
> http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos9.5/information-products/topic-collections/config-guide-mpls-applications/mpls-configuring-load-balancing-for-mpls-lsps.html
> Note: You can include this combination of statements on M320 and T-series
> routing platforms only. If you include them on an M-series router, only the
> first MPLS label and the IP payload are used in the hash key.
> Can this would be a problem to balance traffic in our backbone?
> We cant find a way to fix the unbalanced mpls traffic.
> Is corrected in some JUNOS version for M series?
> We will really apreciate your help.
> Bes regards.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>



-- 
Matthew Tighe
matthew.e.tighe at gmail.com


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list