[j-nsp] Any takers on 10.4R5.5 yet ?

[Joel Jaeggli]

we're running it on trio only mx960s in production. it's got a few issues at least one our outstanding one's (frame-relay encapsulation lti interfaces not working) is fixed in 11 but I don't think we're willing to make that jump yet outside the lab.

On Jun 27, 2011, at 10:05 AM, David Ball wrote:

>  I'm about to stand this up on some MX80s in the lab but wondered if
> any bleeding-edgers out there have already ruled it out on the
> platform, and if so, why.  Certainly mileage will vary depending on
> what you're doing with it, but I'm asking in general (we're
> dual-stacked QoS-enabled MPLS with all services in BGP-signalled VPNs
> with some policing, for example).
> 
>  I know it's unreasonable to have people continually posting to the
> list asking about which code is best, but I know many were waiting for
> a stable 10.4 revision (due in part to its' EEOL nature) but last I
> heard, 10.4R2 (or was it R3) wasn't ready for primetime.  Didn't find
> much in the archives about 10.4R4.
> 
> David
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>