[j-nsp] Difference between M320 and T320

[Mark Tinka]

On Tuesday, March 08, 2011 10:09:00 pm 
cristian.frizziero at iquall.net wrote:

> May be the point is about the maximums about
> logical-interfaces, instances, sessions, etc etc because
> T-Series is more oriented to core applications, and
> M-Series are Edge-Service routers, no matter the
> throughput.

One difference I know is that the T320 has different 'hash-
key' support for 'family multiservice' support when compared 
to the M320, i.e., the M320 gives you more capability.

Apart from that, and the lack of AC PSU's, it's not that 
different from the M320, although I'd probably never 
consider buying either of them and just take an MX for 
Ethernet and a Cisco ASR for non-Ethernet.

Cheers,

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20110310/42d0ffd8/attachment.pgp>