[j-nsp] 10.0 or 10.4?

[Jonathan Towne]

Same story, here.. Upgraded to 10.4R3.4 on an MX480 with MX-MPC2-3D,
here's what I've got:

Mar 30 06:30:05  sns480-re0 fpc0 MQCHIP(0) LI Packet length error, pt entry 14 
Mar 30 06:30:06  sns480-re0 fpc0 MQCHIP(0) LI Packet length error, pt entry 0 
Mar 30 06:30:40  sns480-re0 fpc0 MQCHIP(0) LI Packet length error, pt entry 10 
Mar 30 06:30:41  sns480-re0 fpc0 MQCHIP(0) LI Packet length error, pt entry 0 

Is it causing any adverse effects, or simply being annoying in the logs?
Has anyone confirmed?  I haven't filed anything with JTAC (..yet), but this
router isn't in production (..yet) for IPv4, and this isn't my first issue
with 10.4R3.4.

-- Jonathan Towne


On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 12:04:43AM +0100, Daniel Roesen scribbled:
# On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 10:19:59PM +0100, bas wrote:
# > I tried running 10.4R3 on the MX960, but immediately it reported MQCHIP errors.
# >
# > Mar 23 08:10:17  jun-tc2_re0 fpc4 MQCHIP(0) LI Packet length error, pt entry 9
# > Mar 23 08:10:18  jun-tc2_re0 fpc4 MQCHIP(0) LI Packet length error, pt entry 0
# > Mar 23 08:10:19  jun-tc2_re0 fpc1 MQCHIP(1) LI Packet length error, pt entry 28
# > Mar 23 08:10:20  jun-tc2_re0 fpc9 MQCHIP(1) LI Packet length error, pt entry 0
# 
# We see that on MX80 too, right since upgrading the (totally idle) box.
# Pending JTAC response...
# 
# Best regards,
# Daniel
# 
# -- 
# CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
# _______________________________________________
# juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
# https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
#