[j-nsp] 10.0 or 10.4?

[David Ball]

  Haven't touched 10.4 yet, but 10.0R3.10 has been very solid for us
in what sounds to be a similar environment.  Mostly L2VPNs here, with
some VPLS (BGP and LDP) and VRF thrown in on MXs (240/480) and T640s
(full table on all of them, in a VRF), 2 of which are acting as RRs in
a limited capacity.  Been running it since June 2010 without a single
issue (something I haven't been able to say of earlier versions for a
few years now).

D


On 15 March 2011 02:13, Keegan Holley <keegan.holley at sungard.com> wrote:
> I know the subject of JunOS versions has been beaten to death, but I've
> never seen this specific question asked or answered.  I'm trying to decide
> between 10.0 or 10.4 for a network of MX, M (10i, 120 and 40e) and J series
> routers.  I'd like to choose a train with extended support.  I'm trying to
> decide between the risk of undiscovered bugs in 10.4 and having to upgrade
> sooner when 10.0 goes EOS.  We run L3VPN, with some L2VPN and a shrinking
> VPLS footprint.  Most of the M's and MX's have a full table with some acting
> as regional route reflectors.  Just wanted to get the general opinion of
> those running similar applications.
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>