[j-nsp] Carrier-of-Carriers question

[Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim]

Tasho,

It'll work but you need to have both OSPF/LDP and BGP labeled-unicast on all routers in your network. You'll need 'resolve-vpn' knob under labeled-unicast BGP protocol to install the next-hop into inet.3.

I don't believe there's a way to distribute routes/label info similar to a routing policy distribution if what really want is to have exclusive OSPF/LDP on one part of the network and BGP on the remote sites.

On Nov 17, 2011, at 3:18 PM, Tasho Shukerski wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> As far as I understand you are talking of OSPF/LDP and BGP in the same site.
> Our implementation have the protocols on different sites. I made some tests and the problem I see is
> that on the site with BGP there are no routes with label advertised towards the client carrier router.
> There are only routes but no labels.
> 
> Can you share your config used?
> 
> BR,
> Tasho Shukerski
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim" <ihsan.junaidi at gmail.com>
> To: "Tasho Shukerski" <tasho.shukerski at btc-net.bg>
> Cc: <juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 7:30 PM
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Carrier-of-Carriers question
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I don't see why you can't.
> 
> We have one running in our network.
> 
> Depending on your CoC node topology, you may need to be extra watchful on potential loops or unefficient routing caused primarily by next-hops being mutually distributed by OSPF/LDP and BGP.
> 
> On Nov 16, 2011, at 9:41 PM, Tasho Shukerski wrote:
> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> Can anyone tell me if it is possible to have Carrier-of-Carriers working scenario with one site implemented
>> with OSPF/LDP and the other using eBGP with labeled-unicast?
>> 
>> Thanks in advance,
>> Tasho Shukerski
>> Vivacom
>> Network engineer
>> _______________________________________________
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> 
>