[j-nsp] BGP routes processing

biwa net biwa2go at gmail.com
Sun Nov 20 17:20:47 EST 2011


currently the box is now running fine since the pfe got all the routes

but there will be a new device coming into our network soon and I will do
all the trace and output,

my reason for my mail, is exactly to know what to check and how to see how
long it takes for the BGP to be installed in the PFE on these new boxes
that will come in the network

On 20 November 2011 22:14, JIGGIE <jiggie at gmail.com> wrote:

> If you would like me to take a look please send me config and I can
> review also for you. Thanks
>
> On 11/20/11, biwa net <biwa2go at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Will
> >
> > The 20 min is from the box itself,
> >
> > Basically I have a client directly connected the MX960 and I basically
> try
> > to ping /traceroute  BGP prefixes on the internet through the the transit
> > provider.
> >
> > As it is new device coming into the network, we are just doing testing
> (no
> > production traffic yet) , The configuration is not overly complicated,
> > currently it only has simple config such as ISIS , BGP routes, NO
> > RIB-groups, we have some LDP mpls configuration , but really it's no much
> >
> > Maybe my way of checking is not good, but what I am doing , is
> > ping/traceroute to prefixes on the Internet (our transit from whome we
> > receive the full table being our EBGP nexthop )
> >
> > when doing ping/traceroute, I always get next hop not reachable , as if
> the
> > PFE does not know how to reach the destination (ie does not have the
> route).
> >
> > After 15-20 min ,the same ping/traceroute is then working fine which make
> > me believe that somehow the full BGP table route receive from the
> provider
> > (RIB-In) is taking 15-20min to go through the Rib Loc and Rib out and
> > installed in the PFE.
> >
> > Currently it is not an issue since we usually do test before bringing the
> > box in production , but as we will go ahead other box will come in
> > production and cant afford to wait 15-20 min to have the PFE getting the
> > full table
> >
> > anyway you can advise on how I can check how long it takes from the
> Rib-in
> > to Rib out /PFE (cmds etcc..)?
> >
> >
> > On 20 November 2011 19:40, OBrien, Will <ObrienH at missouri.edu> wrote:
> >
> >> 20 mins is not normal.
> >> Is that from the box or from a downstream client. What are you doing
> with
> >> rib groups and how are you advertising internal routes?
> >>
> >> Will O'Brien
> >>
> >> On Nov 20, 2011, at 1:30 PM, "biwa net" <biwa2go at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > hi
> >> >
> >> > we added in our network a new mx960, with EBGP peering on it
> >> >
> >> > We receive full routing table ,
> >> >
> >> > when I do "show route receive-protocol bgp x.x.x.x> it took around 2-3
> >> min
> >> > for the 380k to be downloaded, which is ok .
> >> >
> >> > But It seems that it took around 20min to be able to reach any bgp
> >> > destination from that BGP full routing table I received, although
> when I
> >> do
> >> > "show rould see the BGP routete ..."I cou .
> >> >
> >> > MY thinking is that it took 2-3 min for the full routing to be
> installed
> >> in
> >> > the RIB-IN, however 20min to be process through the RIB-Loc and then
> the
> >> > RIB-out to be installed in the PFE.
> >> >
> >> > I don't think it is normal for a  device like a MX960 to take that
> long
> >> to
> >> > process and install the routes in the Forwarding Engine
> >> >
> >> > Can anyone advise, how I can see (what commands, output, ...) how long
> >> > it
> >> > takes for the MX960 to process the BGP routes from the RIB-IN to
> >> > Rib-LOC,
> >> > and how long it takes from the RIB-LOc to the RIB-OUT ie:PFE ?
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> >
>
> --
> Sent from my mobile device
>
> Jiggie
>


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list